XWA Upgrade

Geeeze, guys! Give it a rest!!!!!!!!

I can't do that, Dave...

Update! Yes the less DEFAULT textures the more I like it <P>Grand Theft X-Wing! <P> <BR> <BR> <BR>

Looks very nice, or as nice as it can look, given the engine.<P>I'm always impressed by your work, but it always leaves me with a feeling of "such good work, wasted." considering the small number of people that play this game anymore, and the smaller number of people who are aware of your work.

Looks like a well inhabited city. Should be fun to speed through at full throttle. <P>White lights for the new buildings? Now you're just toying with me

That's beautiful.

Yup, Wes. Just to piss you off.

Yeah in full throttle...haha<BR>the pix remind me the level in <B>rogue squadron 3d </B> <I>Defection in Corellia</I> the part i like on that level is taking out the <B>AT-ATs</B>

It looks great!<p>[ 24 July 2006: Message edited by: Dodonna ]

i love it!

<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by JinKazama16:<BR><STRONG>the pix remind me the level in <B>rogue squadron 3d </B> <I>Defection in Corellia</I> the part i like on that level is taking out the <B>AT-ATs</B></STRONG><HR></BLOCKQUOTE><P>That level is fun.

<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by General_Trageton:<BR><STRONG>Grand Theft X-Wing!</STRONG><HR></BLOCKQUOTE><P>I just saw this... Great... Now I'm picturing being able to fly over Liberty City, Vice City, and San Andreas... >_><P>Think the game would even be able to handle one third of a Liberty City without slowdown? I know it's doubtful all of San Andreas would be possible as one map, unless we do separate opts...<P>I just thought of something... what's stopping you guys from using separate opts to go beyond 30km for surfaces (not that you'd ever need to though)?

<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Artichao:<BR><STRONG>I just thought of something... what's stopping you guys from using separate opts to go beyond 30km for surfaces (not that you'd ever need to though)?</STRONG><HR></BLOCKQUOTE><P>Aparently there was a problem when the surfaces needed a sky - since the sky also had to be an opt. Perhabs it was too difficult to split the skydome into smaller seperate opts without breaking the illusion... I dont know for sure.<P>For a discussion of surfaces above 30x30 you might want to look at<A HREF="http://www.xwaupgrade.com/ubbcgi/ultima ... 1&t=005950" TARGET=_blank> this topic</A> - just scroll to them bottom of the first page.<p>[ 24 July 2006: Message edited by: Dodonna ]

Hmm... i think that will be the planet <B>Corellia</B> cause they look the same the environment are the same in <B>Corellia</B>

nonsense.